Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-4.1

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Anthropic · Apr 2026

Anthropic's mid-tier workhorse: near-Opus capability at $3/$15, and the leader on the Finance Agent benchmark.

GPT-4.1

OpenAI · Apr 2025

A non-reasoning workhorse with a 1M-token context window, still popular for predictable-latency production APIs.

The verdict

Claude Sonnet 4.6 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for GPT-4.1. GPT-4.1 is about 1.7x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix).

Benchmark head-to-head 10

SWE-bench Verified
~79.6%54.6%
Claude Sonnet 4.6GPT-4.1

Specs & pricing

Claude Sonnet 4.6GPT-4.1
modhub Index
Input price / 1M$3$2
Output price / 1M$15$8
Context window1M1M
Max output64K33K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelyesno
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext, image
Knowledge cutoffJan 2026Jun 2024
ReleasedApr 2026Apr 2025
Example monthly cost*$52.50$32.00

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GPT-4.1?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for GPT-4.1. GPT-4.1 is about 1.7x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix).
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GPT-4.1?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3/$15 per million input/output tokens, while GPT-4.1 costs $2/$8. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $52.50 versus $32.00.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GPT-4.1?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores ~79.6% versus 54.6% for GPT-4.1, making Claude Sonnet 4.6 the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons