Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-5.5

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Anthropic · Apr 2026

Anthropic's mid-tier workhorse: near-Opus capability at $3/$15, and the leader on the Finance Agent benchmark.

GPT-5.5

OpenAI · Apr 2026

77.2

OpenAI's flagship reasoning model with a 1M-token context window, built for hard coding, science and long-horizon agentic work.

The verdict

GPT-5.5 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Claude Sonnet 4.6. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is about 1.9x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix).

Benchmark head-to-head 01

SWE-bench Verified
~79.6%82.6%
Claude Sonnet 4.6GPT-5.5

Specs & pricing

Claude Sonnet 4.6GPT-5.5
modhub Index77.2
Input price / 1M$3$5
Output price / 1M$15$30
Context window1M1M
Max output64K128K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext, image
Knowledge cutoffJan 2026Jan 2026
ReleasedApr 2026Apr 2026
Example monthly cost*$52.50$95.00

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GPT-5.5?
GPT-5.5 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Claude Sonnet 4.6. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is about 1.9x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix).
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GPT-5.5?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3/$15 per million input/output tokens, while GPT-5.5 costs $5/$30. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $52.50 versus $95.00.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GPT-5.5?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — GPT-5.5 scores 82.6% versus ~79.6% for Claude Sonnet 4.6, making GPT-5.5 the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons