Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GPT-5.5

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Google · May 2026

Google's I/O 2026 headliner: near-Pro intelligence at Flash speed, 78.8% on SWE-bench Verified with full multimodal input.

GPT-5.5

OpenAI · Apr 2026

77.2

OpenAI's flagship reasoning model with a 1M-token context window, built for hard coding, science and long-horizon agentic work.

The verdict

GPT-5.5 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Gemini 3.5 Flash. On price the gap is dramatic: Gemini 3.5 Flash works out roughly 3.3x cheaper per blended million tokens.

Benchmark head-to-head 01

SWE-bench Verified
78.8%82.6%
Gemini 3.5 FlashGPT-5.5

Specs & pricing

Gemini 3.5 FlashGPT-5.5
modhub Index77.2
Input price / 1M$1.5$5
Output price / 1M$9$30
Context window1M1M
Max output66K128K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, image, audio, videotext, image
Knowledge cutoffFeb 2026Jan 2026
ReleasedMay 2026Apr 2026
Example monthly cost*$28.50$95.00

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash or GPT-5.5?
GPT-5.5 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Gemini 3.5 Flash. On price the gap is dramatic: Gemini 3.5 Flash works out roughly 3.3x cheaper per blended million tokens.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash or GPT-5.5?
Gemini 3.5 Flash costs $1.5/$9 per million input/output tokens, while GPT-5.5 costs $5/$30. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $28.50 versus $95.00.
Which model is better for coding, Gemini 3.5 Flash or GPT-5.5?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — GPT-5.5 scores 82.6% versus 78.8% for Gemini 3.5 Flash, making GPT-5.5 the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons