Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Fable 5

Anthropic · Jun 2026

The first GA model of Anthropic's Mythos class — a tier above Opus — and the current SWE-bench Verified leader, at $10/$50 per 1M tokens.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Anthropic · Apr 2026

Anthropic's mid-tier workhorse: near-Opus capability at $3/$15, and the leader on the Finance Agent benchmark.

The verdict

Claude Fable 5 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Claude Sonnet 4.6. On price the gap is dramatic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 works out roughly 3.3x cheaper per blended million tokens.

Benchmark head-to-head 10

SWE-bench Verified
~95%~79.6%
Claude Fable 5Claude Sonnet 4.6

Specs & pricing

Claude Fable 5Claude Sonnet 4.6
modhub Index
Input price / 1M$10$3
Output price / 1M$50$15
Context window1M1M
Max output128K64K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext, image
Knowledge cutoffJan 2026Jan 2026
ReleasedJun 2026Apr 2026
Example monthly cost*$175.00$52.50

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Fable 5 or Claude Sonnet 4.6?
Claude Fable 5 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Claude Sonnet 4.6. On price the gap is dramatic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 works out roughly 3.3x cheaper per blended million tokens.
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Claude Sonnet 4.6?
Claude Fable 5 costs $10/$50 per million input/output tokens, while Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3/$15. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $175.00 versus $52.50.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or Claude Sonnet 4.6?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Claude Fable 5 scores ~95% versus ~79.6% for Claude Sonnet 4.6, making Claude Fable 5 the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons