Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-4.1

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Opus 4.8

Anthropic · May 2026

Anthropic's flagship Opus with adaptive thinking, effort controls and a 1M context — 88.6% on SWE-bench Verified at $5/$25.

GPT-4.1

OpenAI · Apr 2025

A non-reasoning workhorse with a 1M-token context window, still popular for predictable-latency production APIs.

The verdict

Claude Opus 4.8 wins 2 of the 2 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for GPT-4.1. GPT-4.1 is about 2.9x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix).

Benchmark head-to-head 20

SWE-bench Verified
88.6%54.6%
Claude Opus 4.8GPT-4.1
GPQA Diamond
~91%66.3%
Claude Opus 4.8GPT-4.1

Specs & pricing

Claude Opus 4.8GPT-4.1
modhub Index
Input price / 1M$5$2
Output price / 1M$25$8
Context window1M1M
Max output64K33K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelyesno
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext, image
Knowledge cutoffMar 2026Jun 2024
ReleasedMay 2026Apr 2025
Example monthly cost*$87.50$32.00

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-4.1?
Claude Opus 4.8 wins 2 of the 2 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for GPT-4.1. GPT-4.1 is about 2.9x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix).
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-4.1?
Claude Opus 4.8 costs $5/$25 per million input/output tokens, while GPT-4.1 costs $2/$8. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $87.50 versus $32.00.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-4.1?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Claude Opus 4.8 scores 88.6% versus 54.6% for GPT-4.1, making Claude Opus 4.8 the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons