Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.2

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Opus 4.8

Anthropic · May 2026

Anthropic's flagship Opus with adaptive thinking, effort controls and a 1M context — 88.6% on SWE-bench Verified at $5/$25.

GPT-5.2

OpenAI · Dec 2025

The December 2025 GPT-5 refresh: stronger coding and agentic skills than GPT-5.1 at a moderate price, now the value pick in OpenAI's lineup.

The verdict

Claude Opus 4.8 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for GPT-5.2. GPT-5.2 is about 2.1x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix). Claude Opus 4.8 also takes 1M of context versus 400K for GPT-5.2.

Benchmark head-to-head 10

SWE-bench Verified
88.6%~77.9%
Claude Opus 4.8GPT-5.2

Specs & pricing

Claude Opus 4.8GPT-5.2
modhub Index
Input price / 1M$5$1.75
Output price / 1M$25$14
Context window1M400K
Max output64K128K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext, image
Knowledge cutoffMar 2026Aug 2025
ReleasedMay 2026Dec 2025
Example monthly cost*$87.50$38.50

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.2?
Claude Opus 4.8 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for GPT-5.2. GPT-5.2 is about 2.1x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix). Claude Opus 4.8 also takes 1M of context versus 400K for GPT-5.2.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.2?
Claude Opus 4.8 costs $5/$25 per million input/output tokens, while GPT-5.2 costs $1.75/$14. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $87.50 versus $38.50.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.2?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Claude Opus 4.8 scores 88.6% versus ~77.9% for GPT-5.2, making Claude Opus 4.8 the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons