Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Opus 4.8

Anthropic · May 2026

Anthropic's flagship Opus with adaptive thinking, effort controls and a 1M context — 88.6% on SWE-bench Verified at $5/$25.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Anthropic · Apr 2026

Anthropic's mid-tier workhorse: near-Opus capability at $3/$15, and the leader on the Finance Agent benchmark.

The verdict

Claude Opus 4.8 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Claude Sonnet 4.6. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is about 1.7x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix).

Benchmark head-to-head 10

SWE-bench Verified
88.6%~79.6%
Claude Opus 4.8Claude Sonnet 4.6

Specs & pricing

Claude Opus 4.8Claude Sonnet 4.6
modhub Index
Input price / 1M$5$3
Output price / 1M$25$15
Context window1M1M
Max output64K64K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext, image
Knowledge cutoffMar 2026Jan 2026
ReleasedMay 2026Apr 2026
Example monthly cost*$87.50$52.50

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.8 or Claude Sonnet 4.6?
Claude Opus 4.8 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Claude Sonnet 4.6. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is about 1.7x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix).
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.8 or Claude Sonnet 4.6?
Claude Opus 4.8 costs $5/$25 per million input/output tokens, while Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3/$15. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $87.50 versus $52.50.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.8 or Claude Sonnet 4.6?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Claude Opus 4.8 scores 88.6% versus ~79.6% for Claude Sonnet 4.6, making Claude Opus 4.8 the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons