Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-4.1
Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic · Jan 2026
The first Opus with a 1M-token context window at standard pricing, kicking off Anthropic's rapid 2026 release cadence.
GPT-4.1
OpenAI · Apr 2025
A non-reasoning workhorse with a 1M-token context window, still popular for predictable-latency production APIs.
The verdict
Claude Opus 4.6 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for GPT-4.1. GPT-4.1 is about 2.9x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix).
Benchmark head-to-head 1–0
Specs & pricing
| Claude Opus 4.6 | GPT-4.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| modhub Index | — | — |
| Input price / 1M | $5 | $2 |
| Output price / 1M | $25 | $8 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 64K | 33K |
| Open weights | no | no |
| Reasoning model | yes | no |
| Multimodal input | text, image | text, image |
| Knowledge cutoff | Aug 2025 | Jun 2024 |
| Released | Jan 2026 | Apr 2025 |
| Example monthly cost* | $87.50 | $32.00 |
* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.
Frequently asked questions
- Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or GPT-4.1?
- Claude Opus 4.6 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for GPT-4.1. GPT-4.1 is about 2.9x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix).
- Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or GPT-4.1?
- Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5/$25 per million input/output tokens, while GPT-4.1 costs $2/$8. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $87.50 versus $32.00.
- Which model is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.6 or GPT-4.1?
- On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Claude Opus 4.6 scores ~81.4% versus 54.6% for GPT-4.1, making Claude Opus 4.6 the stronger pick for coding agents.