Claude Opus 4.6 vs OpenAI o3

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Opus 4.6

Anthropic · Jan 2026

The first Opus with a 1M-token context window at standard pricing, kicking off Anthropic's rapid 2026 release cadence.

OpenAI o3

OpenAI · Apr 2025

68.9

OpenAI's dedicated 2025 reasoning model that pioneered thinking-with-images and agentic tool use within chain-of-thought.

The verdict

Claude Opus 4.6 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for OpenAI o3. OpenAI o3 is about 2.9x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix). Claude Opus 4.6 also takes 1M of context versus 200K for OpenAI o3.

Benchmark head-to-head 10

SWE-bench Verified
~81.4%69.1%
Claude Opus 4.6OpenAI o3

Specs & pricing

Claude Opus 4.6OpenAI o3
modhub Index68.9
Input price / 1M$5$2
Output price / 1M$25$8
Context window1M200K
Max output64K100K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext, image
Knowledge cutoffAug 2025May 2024
ReleasedJan 2026Apr 2025
Example monthly cost*$87.50$32.00

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or OpenAI o3?
Claude Opus 4.6 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for OpenAI o3. OpenAI o3 is about 2.9x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix). Claude Opus 4.6 also takes 1M of context versus 200K for OpenAI o3.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or OpenAI o3?
Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5/$25 per million input/output tokens, while OpenAI o3 costs $2/$8. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $87.50 versus $32.00.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.6 or OpenAI o3?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Claude Opus 4.6 scores ~81.4% versus 69.1% for OpenAI o3, making Claude Opus 4.6 the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons