Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Opus 4.7

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Opus 4.6

Anthropic · Jan 2026

The first Opus with a 1M-token context window at standard pricing, kicking off Anthropic's rapid 2026 release cadence.

Claude Opus 4.7

Anthropic · Mar 2026

The early-2026 Opus release that pushed SWE-bench past 82% and extended the 1M context to the whole Opus line.

The verdict

Claude Opus 4.7 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Claude Opus 4.6.

Benchmark head-to-head 01

SWE-bench Verified
~81.4%82%
Claude Opus 4.6Claude Opus 4.7

Specs & pricing

Claude Opus 4.6Claude Opus 4.7
modhub Index
Input price / 1M$5$5
Output price / 1M$25$25
Context window1M1M
Max output64K64K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext, image
Knowledge cutoffAug 2025Nov 2025
ReleasedJan 2026Mar 2026
Example monthly cost*$87.50$87.50

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or Claude Opus 4.7?
Claude Opus 4.7 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Claude Opus 4.6.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or Claude Opus 4.7?
Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5/$25 per million input/output tokens, while Claude Opus 4.7 costs $5/$25. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $87.50 versus $87.50.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.6 or Claude Opus 4.7?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Claude Opus 4.7 scores 82% versus ~81.4% for Claude Opus 4.6, making Claude Opus 4.7 the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons