Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.5

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Opus 4.7

Anthropic · Mar 2026

The early-2026 Opus release that pushed SWE-bench past 82% and extended the 1M context to the whole Opus line.

GPT-5.5

OpenAI · Apr 2026

77.2

OpenAI's flagship reasoning model with a 1M-token context window, built for hard coding, science and long-horizon agentic work.

The verdict

GPT-5.5 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Claude Opus 4.7. Claude Opus 4.7 is about 1.1x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix).

Benchmark head-to-head 01

SWE-bench Verified
82%82.6%
Claude Opus 4.7GPT-5.5

Specs & pricing

Claude Opus 4.7GPT-5.5
modhub Index77.2
Input price / 1M$5$5
Output price / 1M$25$30
Context window1M1M
Max output64K128K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext, image
Knowledge cutoffNov 2025Jan 2026
ReleasedMar 2026Apr 2026
Example monthly cost*$87.50$95.00

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.5?
GPT-5.5 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Claude Opus 4.7. Claude Opus 4.7 is about 1.1x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix).
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.5?
Claude Opus 4.7 costs $5/$25 per million input/output tokens, while GPT-5.5 costs $5/$30. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $87.50 versus $95.00.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.5?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — GPT-5.5 scores 82.6% versus 82% for Claude Opus 4.7, making GPT-5.5 the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons