Claude Opus 4.1 vs GPT-4.1

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Opus 4.1

Anthropic · Aug 2025

The last $15/$75-priced Opus — a 2025 flagship now thoroughly superseded by cheaper, stronger successors.

GPT-4.1

OpenAI · Apr 2025

A non-reasoning workhorse with a 1M-token context window, still popular for predictable-latency production APIs.

The verdict

Claude Opus 4.1 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for GPT-4.1. On price the gap is dramatic: GPT-4.1 works out roughly 8.6x cheaper per blended million tokens. GPT-4.1 also takes 1M of context versus 200K for Claude Opus 4.1.

Benchmark head-to-head 10

SWE-bench Verified
74.5%54.6%
Claude Opus 4.1GPT-4.1

Specs & pricing

Claude Opus 4.1GPT-4.1
modhub Index
Input price / 1M$15$2
Output price / 1M$75$8
Context window200K1M
Max output32K33K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelyesno
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext, image
Knowledge cutoffMar 2025Jun 2024
ReleasedAug 2025Apr 2025
Example monthly cost*$262.50$32.00

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.1 or GPT-4.1?
Claude Opus 4.1 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for GPT-4.1. On price the gap is dramatic: GPT-4.1 works out roughly 8.6x cheaper per blended million tokens. GPT-4.1 also takes 1M of context versus 200K for Claude Opus 4.1.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.1 or GPT-4.1?
Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15/$75 per million input/output tokens, while GPT-4.1 costs $2/$8. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $262.50 versus $32.00.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.1 or GPT-4.1?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Claude Opus 4.1 scores 74.5% versus 54.6% for GPT-4.1, making Claude Opus 4.1 the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons