Claude Opus 4.1 vs GPT-5.5

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Opus 4.1

Anthropic · Aug 2025

The last $15/$75-priced Opus — a 2025 flagship now thoroughly superseded by cheaper, stronger successors.

GPT-5.5

OpenAI · Apr 2026

77.2

OpenAI's flagship reasoning model with a 1M-token context window, built for hard coding, science and long-horizon agentic work.

The verdict

GPT-5.5 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Claude Opus 4.1. GPT-5.5 is about 2.7x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix). GPT-5.5 also takes 1M of context versus 200K for Claude Opus 4.1.

Benchmark head-to-head 01

SWE-bench Verified
74.5%82.6%
Claude Opus 4.1GPT-5.5

Specs & pricing

Claude Opus 4.1GPT-5.5
modhub Index77.2
Input price / 1M$15$5
Output price / 1M$75$30
Context window200K1M
Max output32K128K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext, image
Knowledge cutoffMar 2025Jan 2026
ReleasedAug 2025Apr 2026
Example monthly cost*$262.50$95.00

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.1 or GPT-5.5?
GPT-5.5 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Claude Opus 4.1. GPT-5.5 is about 2.7x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix). GPT-5.5 also takes 1M of context versus 200K for Claude Opus 4.1.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.1 or GPT-5.5?
Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15/$75 per million input/output tokens, while GPT-5.5 costs $5/$30. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $262.50 versus $95.00.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.1 or GPT-5.5?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — GPT-5.5 scores 82.6% versus 74.5% for Claude Opus 4.1, making GPT-5.5 the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons