Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.1

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Fable 5

Anthropic · Jun 2026

The first GA model of Anthropic's Mythos class — a tier above Opus — and the current SWE-bench Verified leader, at $10/$50 per 1M tokens.

Claude Opus 4.1

Anthropic · Aug 2025

The last $15/$75-priced Opus — a 2025 flagship now thoroughly superseded by cheaper, stronger successors.

The verdict

Claude Fable 5 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Claude Opus 4.1. Claude Fable 5 is about 1.5x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix). Claude Fable 5 also takes 1M of context versus 200K for Claude Opus 4.1.

Benchmark head-to-head 10

SWE-bench Verified
~95%74.5%
Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 4.1

Specs & pricing

Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 4.1
modhub Index
Input price / 1M$10$15
Output price / 1M$50$75
Context window1M200K
Max output128K32K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext, image
Knowledge cutoffJan 2026Mar 2025
ReleasedJun 2026Aug 2025
Example monthly cost*$175.00$262.50

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Fable 5 or Claude Opus 4.1?
Claude Fable 5 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Claude Opus 4.1. Claude Fable 5 is about 1.5x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix). Claude Fable 5 also takes 1M of context versus 200K for Claude Opus 4.1.
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Claude Opus 4.1?
Claude Fable 5 costs $10/$50 per million input/output tokens, while Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15/$75. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $175.00 versus $262.50.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or Claude Opus 4.1?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Claude Fable 5 scores ~95% versus 74.5% for Claude Opus 4.1, making Claude Fable 5 the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons