Claude Opus 4.1 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Opus 4.1

Anthropic · Aug 2025

The last $15/$75-priced Opus — a 2025 flagship now thoroughly superseded by cheaper, stronger successors.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Anthropic · Apr 2026

Anthropic's mid-tier workhorse: near-Opus capability at $3/$15, and the leader on the Finance Agent benchmark.

The verdict

Claude Sonnet 4.6 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Claude Opus 4.1. On price the gap is dramatic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 works out roughly 5.0x cheaper per blended million tokens. Claude Sonnet 4.6 also takes 1M of context versus 200K for Claude Opus 4.1.

Benchmark head-to-head 01

SWE-bench Verified
74.5%~79.6%
Claude Opus 4.1Claude Sonnet 4.6

Specs & pricing

Claude Opus 4.1Claude Sonnet 4.6
modhub Index
Input price / 1M$15$3
Output price / 1M$75$15
Context window200K1M
Max output32K64K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext, image
Knowledge cutoffMar 2025Jan 2026
ReleasedAug 2025Apr 2026
Example monthly cost*$262.50$52.50

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.1 or Claude Sonnet 4.6?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Claude Opus 4.1. On price the gap is dramatic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 works out roughly 5.0x cheaper per blended million tokens. Claude Sonnet 4.6 also takes 1M of context versus 200K for Claude Opus 4.1.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.1 or Claude Sonnet 4.6?
Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15/$75 per million input/output tokens, while Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3/$15. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $262.50 versus $52.50.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.1 or Claude Sonnet 4.6?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores ~79.6% versus 74.5% for Claude Opus 4.1, making Claude Sonnet 4.6 the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons