Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Qwen3-Max

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Anthropic · Apr 2026

Anthropic's mid-tier workhorse: near-Opus capability at $3/$15, and the leader on the Finance Agent benchmark.

Qwen3-Max

Alibaba (Qwen) · Sep 2025

80.5

Alibaba's trillion-parameter API flagship — frontier-adjacent quality with strong agentic tool use at mid-tier prices.

The verdict

Claude Sonnet 4.6 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Qwen3-Max. Qwen3-Max is about 2.5x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix). Claude Sonnet 4.6 also takes 1M of context versus 262K for Qwen3-Max.

Benchmark head-to-head 10

SWE-bench Verified
~79.6%69.6%
Claude Sonnet 4.6Qwen3-Max

Specs & pricing

Claude Sonnet 4.6Qwen3-Max
modhub Index80.5
Input price / 1M$3$1.2
Output price / 1M$15$6
Context window1M262K
Max output64K66K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext
Knowledge cutoffJan 2026Jun 2025
ReleasedApr 2026Sep 2025
Example monthly cost*$52.50$21.00

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Qwen3-Max?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Qwen3-Max. Qwen3-Max is about 2.5x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix). Claude Sonnet 4.6 also takes 1M of context versus 262K for Qwen3-Max.
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Qwen3-Max?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3/$15 per million input/output tokens, while Qwen3-Max costs $1.2/$6. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $52.50 versus $21.00.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Qwen3-Max?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores ~79.6% versus 69.6% for Qwen3-Max, making Claude Sonnet 4.6 the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons