Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Anthropic · Apr 2026

Anthropic's mid-tier workhorse: near-Opus capability at $3/$15, and the leader on the Finance Agent benchmark.

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Google · May 2026

Google's I/O 2026 headliner: near-Pro intelligence at Flash speed, 78.8% on SWE-bench Verified with full multimodal input.

The verdict

Claude Sonnet 4.6 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Gemini 3.5 Flash. Gemini 3.5 Flash is about 1.8x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix).

Benchmark head-to-head 10

SWE-bench Verified
~79.6%78.8%
Claude Sonnet 4.6Gemini 3.5 Flash

Specs & pricing

Claude Sonnet 4.6Gemini 3.5 Flash
modhub Index
Input price / 1M$3$1.5
Output price / 1M$15$9
Context window1M1M
Max output64K66K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext, image, audio, video
Knowledge cutoffJan 2026Feb 2026
ReleasedApr 2026May 2026
Example monthly cost*$52.50$28.50

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Gemini 3.5 Flash?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Gemini 3.5 Flash. Gemini 3.5 Flash is about 1.8x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix).
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Gemini 3.5 Flash?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3/$15 per million input/output tokens, while Gemini 3.5 Flash costs $1.5/$9. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $52.50 versus $28.50.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Gemini 3.5 Flash?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores ~79.6% versus 78.8% for Gemini 3.5 Flash, making Claude Sonnet 4.6 the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons