Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Anthropic · Sep 2025

65.5

The model that made 30-hour autonomous coding sessions real — 77.2% SWE-bench Verified and a 1M-token context beta at $3/$15.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Anthropic · Apr 2026

Anthropic's mid-tier workhorse: near-Opus capability at $3/$15, and the leader on the Finance Agent benchmark.

The verdict

Claude Sonnet 4.6 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Claude Sonnet 4.5. Claude Sonnet 4.6 also takes 1M of context versus 200K for Claude Sonnet 4.5.

Benchmark head-to-head 01

SWE-bench Verified
77.2%~79.6%
Claude Sonnet 4.5Claude Sonnet 4.6

Specs & pricing

Claude Sonnet 4.5Claude Sonnet 4.6
modhub Index65.5
Input price / 1M$3$3
Output price / 1M$15$15
Context window200K1M
Max output64K64K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext, image
Knowledge cutoffJan 2025Jan 2026
ReleasedSep 2025Apr 2026
Example monthly cost*$52.50$52.50

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.6?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Claude Sonnet 4.5. Claude Sonnet 4.6 also takes 1M of context versus 200K for Claude Sonnet 4.5.
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.6?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs $3/$15 per million input/output tokens, while Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3/$15. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $52.50 versus $52.50.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.6?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores ~79.6% versus 77.2% for Claude Sonnet 4.5, making Claude Sonnet 4.6 the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons