Claude Opus 4.8 vs Grok Code Fast 1

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Opus 4.8

Anthropic · May 2026

Anthropic's flagship Opus with adaptive thinking, effort controls and a 1M context — 88.6% on SWE-bench Verified at $5/$25.

Grok Code Fast 1

xAI · Aug 2025

A speed-first coding model built for agentic IDE loops, popular as a cheap fast tier in Cursor and similar tools.

The verdict

Claude Opus 4.8 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Grok Code Fast 1. On price the gap is dramatic: Grok Code Fast 1 works out roughly 19x cheaper per blended million tokens. Claude Opus 4.8 also takes 1M of context versus 256K for Grok Code Fast 1.

Benchmark head-to-head 10

SWE-bench Verified
88.6%70.8%
Claude Opus 4.8Grok Code Fast 1

Specs & pricing

Claude Opus 4.8Grok Code Fast 1
modhub Index
Input price / 1M$5$0.2
Output price / 1M$25$1.5
Context window1M256K
Max output64K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext
Knowledge cutoffMar 2026Aug 2025
ReleasedMay 2026Aug 2025
Example monthly cost*$87.50$4.25

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.8 or Grok Code Fast 1?
Claude Opus 4.8 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Grok Code Fast 1. On price the gap is dramatic: Grok Code Fast 1 works out roughly 19x cheaper per blended million tokens. Claude Opus 4.8 also takes 1M of context versus 256K for Grok Code Fast 1.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.8 or Grok Code Fast 1?
Claude Opus 4.8 costs $5/$25 per million input/output tokens, while Grok Code Fast 1 costs $0.2/$1.5. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $87.50 versus $4.25.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.8 or Grok Code Fast 1?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Claude Opus 4.8 scores 88.6% versus 70.8% for Grok Code Fast 1, making Claude Opus 4.8 the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons