Claude Opus 4.8 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Opus 4.8

Anthropic · May 2026

Anthropic's flagship Opus with adaptive thinking, effort controls and a 1M context — 88.6% on SWE-bench Verified at $5/$25.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Google · Mar 2026

Google's flagship with the industry's largest context window — 2M tokens — and frontier multimodal reasoning at $2/$12.

The verdict

Claude Opus 4.8 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Gemini 3.1 Pro. Gemini 3.1 Pro is about 2.2x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix). Gemini 3.1 Pro also takes 2M of context versus 1M for Claude Opus 4.8.

Benchmark head-to-head 10

SWE-bench Verified
88.6%~78%
Claude Opus 4.8Gemini 3.1 Pro

Specs & pricing

Claude Opus 4.8Gemini 3.1 Pro
modhub Index
Input price / 1M$5$2
Output price / 1M$25$12
Context window1M2M
Max output64K66K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext, image, audio, video
Knowledge cutoffMar 2026Nov 2025
ReleasedMay 2026Mar 2026
Example monthly cost*$87.50$38.00

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.8 or Gemini 3.1 Pro?
Claude Opus 4.8 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Gemini 3.1 Pro. Gemini 3.1 Pro is about 2.2x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix). Gemini 3.1 Pro also takes 2M of context versus 1M for Claude Opus 4.8.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.8 or Gemini 3.1 Pro?
Claude Opus 4.8 costs $5/$25 per million input/output tokens, while Gemini 3.1 Pro costs $2/$12. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $87.50 versus $38.00.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.8 or Gemini 3.1 Pro?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Claude Opus 4.8 scores 88.6% versus ~78% for Gemini 3.1 Pro, making Claude Opus 4.8 the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons