Claude Opus 4.7 vs GLM-5

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Opus 4.7

Anthropic · Mar 2026

The early-2026 Opus release that pushed SWE-bench past 82% and extended the 1M context to the whole Opus line.

GLM-5

Z.ai (Zhipu) · Feb 2026

Z.ai's 744B open-weights MoE — within ~4 points of Opus 4.6 on SWE-bench Verified at $1/$3.20 per million tokens.

The verdict

Claude Opus 4.7 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for GLM-5. On price the gap is dramatic: GLM-5 works out roughly 6.5x cheaper per blended million tokens. Claude Opus 4.7 also takes 1M of context versus 200K for GLM-5. And GLM-5 is open-weights (MIT), so it can be self-hosted — a structural advantage if data control or vendor independence matters.

Benchmark head-to-head 10

SWE-bench Verified
82%~77.8%
Claude Opus 4.7GLM-5

Specs & pricing

Claude Opus 4.7GLM-5
modhub Index
Input price / 1M$5$1
Output price / 1M$25$3.2
Context window1M200K
Max output64K128K
Open weightsnoyes (MIT)
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext
Knowledge cutoffNov 2025Dec 2025
ReleasedMar 2026Feb 2026
Example monthly cost*$87.50$14.80

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.7 or GLM-5?
Claude Opus 4.7 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for GLM-5. On price the gap is dramatic: GLM-5 works out roughly 6.5x cheaper per blended million tokens. Claude Opus 4.7 also takes 1M of context versus 200K for GLM-5. And GLM-5 is open-weights (MIT), so it can be self-hosted — a structural advantage if data control or vendor independence matters.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 or GLM-5?
Claude Opus 4.7 costs $5/$25 per million input/output tokens, while GLM-5 costs $1/$3.2. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $87.50 versus $14.80.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.7 or GLM-5?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Claude Opus 4.7 scores 82% versus ~77.8% for GLM-5, making Claude Opus 4.7 the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons