Claude Opus 4.7 vs GLM-4.6

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Opus 4.7

Anthropic · Mar 2026

The early-2026 Opus release that pushed SWE-bench past 82% and extended the 1M context to the whole Opus line.

GLM-4.6

Z.ai (Zhipu) · Sep 2025

63.9

The budget coding-agent favorite of late 2025 — near-Sonnet coding utility with MIT weights and a $3/month plan.

The verdict

Claude Opus 4.7 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for GLM-4.6. On price the gap is dramatic: GLM-4.6 works out roughly 10x cheaper per blended million tokens. Claude Opus 4.7 also takes 1M of context versus 200K for GLM-4.6. And GLM-4.6 is open-weights (MIT), so it can be self-hosted — a structural advantage if data control or vendor independence matters.

Benchmark head-to-head 10

SWE-bench Verified
82%68%
Claude Opus 4.7GLM-4.6

Specs & pricing

Claude Opus 4.7GLM-4.6
modhub Index63.9
Input price / 1M$5$0.6
Output price / 1M$25$2.2
Context window1M200K
Max output64K128K
Open weightsnoyes (MIT)
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext
Knowledge cutoffNov 2025Jul 2025
ReleasedMar 2026Sep 2025
Example monthly cost*$87.50$9.30

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.7 or GLM-4.6?
Claude Opus 4.7 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for GLM-4.6. On price the gap is dramatic: GLM-4.6 works out roughly 10x cheaper per blended million tokens. Claude Opus 4.7 also takes 1M of context versus 200K for GLM-4.6. And GLM-4.6 is open-weights (MIT), so it can be self-hosted — a structural advantage if data control or vendor independence matters.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 or GLM-4.6?
Claude Opus 4.7 costs $5/$25 per million input/output tokens, while GLM-4.6 costs $0.6/$2.2. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $87.50 versus $9.30.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.7 or GLM-4.6?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Claude Opus 4.7 scores 82% versus 68% for GLM-4.6, making Claude Opus 4.7 the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons