Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Opus 4.7

Anthropic · Mar 2026

The early-2026 Opus release that pushed SWE-bench past 82% and extended the 1M context to the whole Opus line.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Google · Mar 2025

70.9

Google's 2025 workhorse flagship — first mainstream thinking model with a 1M context, still widely deployed.

The verdict

Claude Opus 4.7 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Gemini 2.5 Pro. Gemini 2.5 Pro is about 2.9x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix). Gemini 2.5 Pro also takes 1.0M of context versus 1M for Claude Opus 4.7.

Benchmark head-to-head 10

SWE-bench Verified
82%63.8%
Claude Opus 4.7Gemini 2.5 Pro

Specs & pricing

Claude Opus 4.7Gemini 2.5 Pro
modhub Index70.9
Input price / 1M$5$1.25
Output price / 1M$25$10
Context window1M1.0M
Max output64K66K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext, image, audio, video
Knowledge cutoffNov 2025Jan 2025
ReleasedMar 2026Mar 2025
Example monthly cost*$87.50$27.50

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.7 or Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Claude Opus 4.7 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Gemini 2.5 Pro. Gemini 2.5 Pro is about 2.9x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix). Gemini 2.5 Pro also takes 1.0M of context versus 1M for Claude Opus 4.7.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 or Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Claude Opus 4.7 costs $5/$25 per million input/output tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.25/$10. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $87.50 versus $27.50.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.7 or Gemini 2.5 Pro?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Claude Opus 4.7 scores 82% versus 63.8% for Gemini 2.5 Pro, making Claude Opus 4.7 the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons