Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Opus 4.7

Anthropic · Mar 2026

The early-2026 Opus release that pushed SWE-bench past 82% and extended the 1M context to the whole Opus line.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Google · Jun 2025

The 2025 fast-tier favorite: hybrid reasoning, full multimodality and a 1M context at $0.30/$2.50.

The verdict

Claude Opus 4.7 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Gemini 2.5 Flash. On price the gap is dramatic: Gemini 2.5 Flash works out roughly 12x cheaper per blended million tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash also takes 1.0M of context versus 1M for Claude Opus 4.7.

Benchmark head-to-head 10

SWE-bench Verified
82%~48.9%
Claude Opus 4.7Gemini 2.5 Flash

Specs & pricing

Claude Opus 4.7Gemini 2.5 Flash
modhub Index
Input price / 1M$5$0.3
Output price / 1M$25$2.5
Context window1M1.0M
Max output64K66K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext, image, audio, video
Knowledge cutoffNov 2025Jan 2025
ReleasedMar 2026Jun 2025
Example monthly cost*$87.50$6.75

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.7 or Gemini 2.5 Flash?
Claude Opus 4.7 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Gemini 2.5 Flash. On price the gap is dramatic: Gemini 2.5 Flash works out roughly 12x cheaper per blended million tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash also takes 1.0M of context versus 1M for Claude Opus 4.7.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 or Gemini 2.5 Flash?
Claude Opus 4.7 costs $5/$25 per million input/output tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Flash costs $0.3/$2.5. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $87.50 versus $6.75.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.7 or Gemini 2.5 Flash?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Claude Opus 4.7 scores 82% versus ~48.9% for Gemini 2.5 Flash, making Claude Opus 4.7 the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons