Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-4o

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Opus 4.6

Anthropic · Jan 2026

The first Opus with a 1M-token context window at standard pricing, kicking off Anthropic's rapid 2026 release cadence.

GPT-4o

OpenAI · May 2024

The 2024 omni-modal classic with native audio in and out; superseded at the frontier but still everywhere in production.

The verdict

Claude Opus 4.6 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for GPT-4o. GPT-4o is about 2.3x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix). Claude Opus 4.6 also takes 1M of context versus 128K for GPT-4o.

Benchmark head-to-head 10

SWE-bench Verified
~81.4%33.2%
Claude Opus 4.6GPT-4o

Specs & pricing

Claude Opus 4.6GPT-4o
modhub Index
Input price / 1M$5$2.5
Output price / 1M$25$10
Context window1M128K
Max output64K16K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelyesno
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext, image, audio
Knowledge cutoffAug 2025Oct 2023
ReleasedJan 2026May 2024
Example monthly cost*$87.50$40.00

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or GPT-4o?
Claude Opus 4.6 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for GPT-4o. GPT-4o is about 2.3x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix). Claude Opus 4.6 also takes 1M of context versus 128K for GPT-4o.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or GPT-4o?
Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5/$25 per million input/output tokens, while GPT-4o costs $2.5/$10. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $87.50 versus $40.00.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.6 or GPT-4o?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Claude Opus 4.6 scores ~81.4% versus 33.2% for GPT-4o, making Claude Opus 4.6 the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons