Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 3 Pro

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Opus 4.6

Anthropic · Jan 2026

The first Opus with a 1M-token context window at standard pricing, kicking off Anthropic's rapid 2026 release cadence.

Gemini 3 Pro

Google · Nov 2025

73.6

Google's November 2025 frontier breakout — 91.9% GPQA Diamond and 37.5% HLE made it the reasoning leader of its generation.

The verdict

Claude Opus 4.6 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Gemini 3 Pro. Gemini 3 Pro is about 2.2x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix).

Benchmark head-to-head 10

SWE-bench Verified
~81.4%76.2%
Claude Opus 4.6Gemini 3 Pro

Specs & pricing

Claude Opus 4.6Gemini 3 Pro
modhub Index73.6
Input price / 1M$5$2
Output price / 1M$25$12
Context window1M1M
Max output64K66K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext, image, audio, video
Knowledge cutoffAug 2025Jan 2025
ReleasedJan 2026Nov 2025
Example monthly cost*$87.50$38.00

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or Gemini 3 Pro?
Claude Opus 4.6 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Gemini 3 Pro. Gemini 3 Pro is about 2.2x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix).
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or Gemini 3 Pro?
Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5/$25 per million input/output tokens, while Gemini 3 Pro costs $2/$12. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $87.50 versus $38.00.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.6 or Gemini 3 Pro?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Claude Opus 4.6 scores ~81.4% versus 76.2% for Gemini 3 Pro, making Claude Opus 4.6 the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons