Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4.7

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Opus 4.5

Anthropic · Nov 2025

The November 2025 Opus that cut flagship pricing 3x to $5/$25 and was the first model past 80% on SWE-bench Verified.

Claude Opus 4.7

Anthropic · Mar 2026

The early-2026 Opus release that pushed SWE-bench past 82% and extended the 1M context to the whole Opus line.

The verdict

Claude Opus 4.7 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Claude Opus 4.5. Claude Opus 4.7 also takes 1M of context versus 200K for Claude Opus 4.5.

Benchmark head-to-head 01

SWE-bench Verified
80.9%82%
Claude Opus 4.5Claude Opus 4.7

Specs & pricing

Claude Opus 4.5Claude Opus 4.7
modhub Index
Input price / 1M$5$5
Output price / 1M$25$25
Context window200K1M
Max output64K64K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext, image
Knowledge cutoffMar 2025Nov 2025
ReleasedNov 2025Mar 2026
Example monthly cost*$87.50$87.50

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.5 or Claude Opus 4.7?
Claude Opus 4.7 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Claude Opus 4.5. Claude Opus 4.7 also takes 1M of context versus 200K for Claude Opus 4.5.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 or Claude Opus 4.7?
Claude Opus 4.5 costs $5/$25 per million input/output tokens, while Claude Opus 4.7 costs $5/$25. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $87.50 versus $87.50.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.5 or Claude Opus 4.7?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Claude Opus 4.7 scores 82% versus 80.9% for Claude Opus 4.5, making Claude Opus 4.7 the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons