Claude Opus 4.1 vs Qwen3-Max

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Opus 4.1

Anthropic · Aug 2025

The last $15/$75-priced Opus — a 2025 flagship now thoroughly superseded by cheaper, stronger successors.

Qwen3-Max

Alibaba (Qwen) · Sep 2025

80.5

Alibaba's trillion-parameter API flagship — frontier-adjacent quality with strong agentic tool use at mid-tier prices.

The verdict

Claude Opus 4.1 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Qwen3-Max. On price the gap is dramatic: Qwen3-Max works out roughly 13x cheaper per blended million tokens. Qwen3-Max also takes 262K of context versus 200K for Claude Opus 4.1.

Benchmark head-to-head 10

SWE-bench Verified
74.5%69.6%
Claude Opus 4.1Qwen3-Max

Specs & pricing

Claude Opus 4.1Qwen3-Max
modhub Index80.5
Input price / 1M$15$1.2
Output price / 1M$75$6
Context window200K262K
Max output32K66K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext
Knowledge cutoffMar 2025Jun 2025
ReleasedAug 2025Sep 2025
Example monthly cost*$262.50$21.00

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.1 or Qwen3-Max?
Claude Opus 4.1 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Qwen3-Max. On price the gap is dramatic: Qwen3-Max works out roughly 13x cheaper per blended million tokens. Qwen3-Max also takes 262K of context versus 200K for Claude Opus 4.1.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.1 or Qwen3-Max?
Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15/$75 per million input/output tokens, while Qwen3-Max costs $1.2/$6. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $262.50 versus $21.00.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.1 or Qwen3-Max?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Claude Opus 4.1 scores 74.5% versus 69.6% for Qwen3-Max, making Claude Opus 4.1 the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons