Claude Opus 4.1 vs GPT-4o

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Opus 4.1

Anthropic · Aug 2025

The last $15/$75-priced Opus — a 2025 flagship now thoroughly superseded by cheaper, stronger successors.

GPT-4o

OpenAI · May 2024

The 2024 omni-modal classic with native audio in and out; superseded at the frontier but still everywhere in production.

The verdict

Claude Opus 4.1 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for GPT-4o. On price the gap is dramatic: GPT-4o works out roughly 6.9x cheaper per blended million tokens. Claude Opus 4.1 also takes 200K of context versus 128K for GPT-4o.

Benchmark head-to-head 10

SWE-bench Verified
74.5%33.2%
Claude Opus 4.1GPT-4o

Specs & pricing

Claude Opus 4.1GPT-4o
modhub Index
Input price / 1M$15$2.5
Output price / 1M$75$10
Context window200K128K
Max output32K16K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelyesno
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext, image, audio
Knowledge cutoffMar 2025Oct 2023
ReleasedAug 2025May 2024
Example monthly cost*$262.50$40.00

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.1 or GPT-4o?
Claude Opus 4.1 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for GPT-4o. On price the gap is dramatic: GPT-4o works out roughly 6.9x cheaper per blended million tokens. Claude Opus 4.1 also takes 200K of context versus 128K for GPT-4o.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.1 or GPT-4o?
Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15/$75 per million input/output tokens, while GPT-4o costs $2.5/$10. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $262.50 versus $40.00.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.1 or GPT-4o?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Claude Opus 4.1 scores 74.5% versus 33.2% for GPT-4o, making Claude Opus 4.1 the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons