Claude Opus 4.1 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Opus 4.1

Anthropic · Aug 2025

The last $15/$75-priced Opus — a 2025 flagship now thoroughly superseded by cheaper, stronger successors.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Google · Mar 2026

Google's flagship with the industry's largest context window — 2M tokens — and frontier multimodal reasoning at $2/$12.

The verdict

Gemini 3.1 Pro wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Claude Opus 4.1. On price the gap is dramatic: Gemini 3.1 Pro works out roughly 6.7x cheaper per blended million tokens. Gemini 3.1 Pro also takes 2M of context versus 200K for Claude Opus 4.1.

Benchmark head-to-head 01

SWE-bench Verified
74.5%~78%
Claude Opus 4.1Gemini 3.1 Pro

Specs & pricing

Claude Opus 4.1Gemini 3.1 Pro
modhub Index
Input price / 1M$15$2
Output price / 1M$75$12
Context window200K2M
Max output32K66K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext, image, audio, video
Knowledge cutoffMar 2025Nov 2025
ReleasedAug 2025Mar 2026
Example monthly cost*$262.50$38.00

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.1 or Gemini 3.1 Pro?
Gemini 3.1 Pro wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Claude Opus 4.1. On price the gap is dramatic: Gemini 3.1 Pro works out roughly 6.7x cheaper per blended million tokens. Gemini 3.1 Pro also takes 2M of context versus 200K for Claude Opus 4.1.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.1 or Gemini 3.1 Pro?
Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15/$75 per million input/output tokens, while Gemini 3.1 Pro costs $2/$12. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $262.50 versus $38.00.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.1 or Gemini 3.1 Pro?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Gemini 3.1 Pro scores ~78% versus 74.5% for Claude Opus 4.1, making Gemini 3.1 Pro the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons