Claude Opus 4.1 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Opus 4.1

Anthropic · Aug 2025

The last $15/$75-priced Opus — a 2025 flagship now thoroughly superseded by cheaper, stronger successors.

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Anthropic · Sep 2025

65.5

The model that made 30-hour autonomous coding sessions real — 77.2% SWE-bench Verified and a 1M-token context beta at $3/$15.

The verdict

Claude Sonnet 4.5 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Claude Opus 4.1. On price the gap is dramatic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 works out roughly 5.0x cheaper per blended million tokens.

Benchmark head-to-head 01

SWE-bench Verified
74.5%77.2%
Claude Opus 4.1Claude Sonnet 4.5

Specs & pricing

Claude Opus 4.1Claude Sonnet 4.5
modhub Index65.5
Input price / 1M$15$3
Output price / 1M$75$15
Context window200K200K
Max output32K64K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext, image
Knowledge cutoffMar 2025Jan 2025
ReleasedAug 2025Sep 2025
Example monthly cost*$262.50$52.50

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.1 or Claude Sonnet 4.5?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Claude Opus 4.1. On price the gap is dramatic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 works out roughly 5.0x cheaper per blended million tokens.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.1 or Claude Sonnet 4.5?
Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15/$75 per million input/output tokens, while Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs $3/$15. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $262.50 versus $52.50.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.1 or Claude Sonnet 4.5?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Claude Sonnet 4.5 scores 77.2% versus 74.5% for Claude Opus 4.1, making Claude Sonnet 4.5 the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons