Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4.6

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Anthropic · Oct 2025

Anthropic's fast tier: Sonnet-4-class coding performance at $1/$5 and more than twice the speed.

Claude Opus 4.6

Anthropic · Jan 2026

The first Opus with a 1M-token context window at standard pricing, kicking off Anthropic's rapid 2026 release cadence.

The verdict

Claude Opus 4.6 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Claude Haiku 4.5. On price the gap is dramatic: Claude Haiku 4.5 works out roughly 5.0x cheaper per blended million tokens. Claude Opus 4.6 also takes 1M of context versus 200K for Claude Haiku 4.5.

Benchmark head-to-head 01

SWE-bench Verified
73.3%~81.4%
Claude Haiku 4.5Claude Opus 4.6

Specs & pricing

Claude Haiku 4.5Claude Opus 4.6
modhub Index
Input price / 1M$1$5
Output price / 1M$5$25
Context window200K1M
Max output64K64K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext, image
Knowledge cutoffFeb 2025Aug 2025
ReleasedOct 2025Jan 2026
Example monthly cost*$17.50$87.50

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Opus 4.6?
Claude Opus 4.6 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Claude Haiku 4.5. On price the gap is dramatic: Claude Haiku 4.5 works out roughly 5.0x cheaper per blended million tokens. Claude Opus 4.6 also takes 1M of context versus 200K for Claude Haiku 4.5.
Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Opus 4.6?
Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1/$5 per million input/output tokens, while Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5/$25. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $17.50 versus $87.50.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Opus 4.6?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Claude Opus 4.6 scores ~81.4% versus 73.3% for Claude Haiku 4.5, making Claude Opus 4.6 the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons