Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4.1

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Anthropic · Oct 2025

Anthropic's fast tier: Sonnet-4-class coding performance at $1/$5 and more than twice the speed.

Claude Opus 4.1

Anthropic · Aug 2025

The last $15/$75-priced Opus — a 2025 flagship now thoroughly superseded by cheaper, stronger successors.

The verdict

Claude Opus 4.1 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Claude Haiku 4.5. On price the gap is dramatic: Claude Haiku 4.5 works out roughly 15x cheaper per blended million tokens.

Benchmark head-to-head 01

SWE-bench Verified
73.3%74.5%
Claude Haiku 4.5Claude Opus 4.1

Specs & pricing

Claude Haiku 4.5Claude Opus 4.1
modhub Index
Input price / 1M$1$15
Output price / 1M$5$75
Context window200K200K
Max output64K32K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext, image
Knowledge cutoffFeb 2025Mar 2025
ReleasedOct 2025Aug 2025
Example monthly cost*$17.50$262.50

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Opus 4.1?
Claude Opus 4.1 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Claude Haiku 4.5. On price the gap is dramatic: Claude Haiku 4.5 works out roughly 15x cheaper per blended million tokens.
Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Opus 4.1?
Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1/$5 per million input/output tokens, while Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15/$75. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $17.50 versus $262.50.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Opus 4.1?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Claude Opus 4.1 scores 74.5% versus 73.3% for Claude Haiku 4.5, making Claude Opus 4.1 the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons