Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-4.1

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Claude Fable 5

Anthropic · Jun 2026

The first GA model of Anthropic's Mythos class — a tier above Opus — and the current SWE-bench Verified leader, at $10/$50 per 1M tokens.

GPT-4.1

OpenAI · Apr 2025

A non-reasoning workhorse with a 1M-token context window, still popular for predictable-latency production APIs.

The verdict

Claude Fable 5 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for GPT-4.1. On price the gap is dramatic: GPT-4.1 works out roughly 5.7x cheaper per blended million tokens.

Benchmark head-to-head 10

SWE-bench Verified
~95%54.6%
Claude Fable 5GPT-4.1

Specs & pricing

Claude Fable 5GPT-4.1
modhub Index
Input price / 1M$10$2
Output price / 1M$50$8
Context window1M1M
Max output128K33K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelyesno
Multimodal inputtext, imagetext, image
Knowledge cutoffJan 2026Jun 2024
ReleasedJun 2026Apr 2025
Example monthly cost*$175.00$32.00

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Fable 5 or GPT-4.1?
Claude Fable 5 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for GPT-4.1. On price the gap is dramatic: GPT-4.1 works out roughly 5.7x cheaper per blended million tokens.
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or GPT-4.1?
Claude Fable 5 costs $10/$50 per million input/output tokens, while GPT-4.1 costs $2/$8. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $175.00 versus $32.00.
Which model is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or GPT-4.1?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Claude Fable 5 scores ~95% versus 54.6% for GPT-4.1, making Claude Fable 5 the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons