GLM-5.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

GLM-5.1

Z.ai (Zhipu) · Apr 2026

The April 2026 GLM refresh — the first open-weights model to take #1 on SWE-bench Pro, edging out Claude Opus 4.6.

Qwen3-Coder-Next

Alibaba (Qwen) · Feb 2026

The 2026 open coding specialist: 70.6% SWE-bench Verified under Apache 2.0 from $0.11 per million input tokens.

The verdict

These two models don't yet share verified results on the benchmarks we track, so judge them on specs, pricing and intended use. On price the gap is dramatic: Qwen3-Coder-Next works out roughly 7.6x cheaper per blended million tokens. Qwen3-Coder-Next also takes 262K of context versus 200K for GLM-5.1.

Specs & pricing

GLM-5.1Qwen3-Coder-Next
modhub Index
Input price / 1M$1.4$0.11
Output price / 1M$4.4$0.8
Context window200K262K
Max output128K66K
Open weightsyes (MIT)yes (Apache 2.0)
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtexttext
Knowledge cutoffFeb 2026Nov 2025
ReleasedApr 2026Feb 2026
Example monthly cost*$20.60$2.30

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, GLM-5.1 or Qwen3-Coder-Next?
These two models don't yet share verified results on the benchmarks we track, so judge them on specs, pricing and intended use. On price the gap is dramatic: Qwen3-Coder-Next works out roughly 7.6x cheaper per blended million tokens. Qwen3-Coder-Next also takes 262K of context versus 200K for GLM-5.1.
Which is cheaper, GLM-5.1 or Qwen3-Coder-Next?
GLM-5.1 costs $1.4/$4.4 per million input/output tokens, while Qwen3-Coder-Next costs $0.11/$0.8. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $20.60 versus $2.30.
Which model is better for coding, GLM-5.1 or Qwen3-Coder-Next?
We don't yet track SWE-bench Verified results for both models; check their individual pages for coding-related scores.

More comparisons