GLM-4.6 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

GLM-4.6

Z.ai (Zhipu) · Sep 2025

63.9

The budget coding-agent favorite of late 2025 — near-Sonnet coding utility with MIT weights and a $3/month plan.

Qwen3-Coder-Next

Alibaba (Qwen) · Feb 2026

The 2026 open coding specialist: 70.6% SWE-bench Verified under Apache 2.0 from $0.11 per million input tokens.

The verdict

Qwen3-Coder-Next wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for GLM-4.6. On price the gap is dramatic: Qwen3-Coder-Next works out roughly 3.5x cheaper per blended million tokens. Qwen3-Coder-Next also takes 262K of context versus 200K for GLM-4.6.

Benchmark head-to-head 01

SWE-bench Verified
68%70.6%
GLM-4.6Qwen3-Coder-Next

Specs & pricing

GLM-4.6Qwen3-Coder-Next
modhub Index63.9
Input price / 1M$0.6$0.11
Output price / 1M$2.2$0.8
Context window200K262K
Max output128K66K
Open weightsyes (MIT)yes (Apache 2.0)
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtexttext
Knowledge cutoffJul 2025Nov 2025
ReleasedSep 2025Feb 2026
Example monthly cost*$9.30$2.30

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, GLM-4.6 or Qwen3-Coder-Next?
Qwen3-Coder-Next wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for GLM-4.6. On price the gap is dramatic: Qwen3-Coder-Next works out roughly 3.5x cheaper per blended million tokens. Qwen3-Coder-Next also takes 262K of context versus 200K for GLM-4.6.
Which is cheaper, GLM-4.6 or Qwen3-Coder-Next?
GLM-4.6 costs $0.6/$2.2 per million input/output tokens, while Qwen3-Coder-Next costs $0.11/$0.8. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $9.30 versus $2.30.
Which model is better for coding, GLM-4.6 or Qwen3-Coder-Next?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Qwen3-Coder-Next scores 70.6% versus 68% for GLM-4.6, making Qwen3-Coder-Next the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons