GLM-4.6 vs Kimi K2.6
Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.
GLM-4.6
63.9Z.ai (Zhipu) · Sep 2025
The budget coding-agent favorite of late 2025 — near-Sonnet coding utility with MIT weights and a $3/month plan.
Kimi K2.6
Moonshot AI · Apr 2026
Moonshot's multimodal flagship that ties GPT-5.5 on several coding evaluations at a fraction of the price, with open weights.
The verdict
Kimi K2.6 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for GLM-4.6. GLM-4.6 is about 1.7x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix). Kimi K2.6 also takes 262K of context versus 200K for GLM-4.6.
Benchmark head-to-head 0–1
Specs & pricing
| GLM-4.6 | Kimi K2.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| modhub Index | 63.9 | — |
| Input price / 1M | $0.6 | $0.95 |
| Output price / 1M | $2.2 | $4 |
| Context window | 200K | 262K |
| Max output | 128K | 262K |
| Open weights | yes (MIT) | yes (Modified MIT) |
| Reasoning model | yes | yes |
| Multimodal input | text | text, image |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jul 2025 | Feb 2026 |
| Released | Sep 2025 | Apr 2026 |
| Example monthly cost* | $9.30 | $15.50 |
* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.
Frequently asked questions
- Which is better, GLM-4.6 or Kimi K2.6?
- Kimi K2.6 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for GLM-4.6. GLM-4.6 is about 1.7x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix). Kimi K2.6 also takes 262K of context versus 200K for GLM-4.6.
- Which is cheaper, GLM-4.6 or Kimi K2.6?
- GLM-4.6 costs $0.6/$2.2 per million input/output tokens, while Kimi K2.6 costs $0.95/$4. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $9.30 versus $15.50.
- Which model is better for coding, GLM-4.6 or Kimi K2.6?
- On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Kimi K2.6 scores ~82.5% versus 68% for GLM-4.6, making Kimi K2.6 the stronger pick for coding agents.