GLM-4.6 vs Grok 4

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

GLM-4.6

Z.ai (Zhipu) · Sep 2025

63.9

The budget coding-agent favorite of late 2025 — near-Sonnet coding utility with MIT weights and a $3/month plan.

Grok 4

xAI · Jul 2025

xAI's mid-2025 flagship, trained on the 200K-GPU Colossus cluster — a math and science reasoning standout of its generation.

The verdict

Grok 4 wins 2 of the 3 benchmarks these models share, against 1 for GLM-4.6. On price the gap is dramatic: GLM-4.6 works out roughly 6.0x cheaper per blended million tokens. Grok 4 also takes 256K of context versus 200K for GLM-4.6. And GLM-4.6 is open-weights (MIT), so it can be self-hosted — a structural advantage if data control or vendor independence matters.

Benchmark head-to-head 12

GPQA Diamond
~81%87.5%
GLM-4.6Grok 4
AIME 2025
~93.9%91.7%
GLM-4.6Grok 4
HLE
~17.2%25.4%
GLM-4.6Grok 4

Specs & pricing

GLM-4.6Grok 4
modhub Index63.9
Input price / 1M$0.6$3
Output price / 1M$2.2$15
Context window200K256K
Max output128K
Open weightsyes (MIT)no
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtexttext, image
Knowledge cutoffJul 2025Jul 2025
ReleasedSep 2025Jul 2025
Example monthly cost*$9.30$52.50

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, GLM-4.6 or Grok 4?
Grok 4 wins 2 of the 3 benchmarks these models share, against 1 for GLM-4.6. On price the gap is dramatic: GLM-4.6 works out roughly 6.0x cheaper per blended million tokens. Grok 4 also takes 256K of context versus 200K for GLM-4.6. And GLM-4.6 is open-weights (MIT), so it can be self-hosted — a structural advantage if data control or vendor independence matters.
Which is cheaper, GLM-4.6 or Grok 4?
GLM-4.6 costs $0.6/$2.2 per million input/output tokens, while Grok 4 costs $3/$15. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $9.30 versus $52.50.
Which model is better for coding, GLM-4.6 or Grok 4?
We don't yet track SWE-bench Verified results for both models; check their individual pages for coding-related scores.

More comparisons