GLM-4.6 vs GLM-5

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

GLM-4.6

Z.ai (Zhipu) · Sep 2025

63.9

The budget coding-agent favorite of late 2025 — near-Sonnet coding utility with MIT weights and a $3/month plan.

GLM-5

Z.ai (Zhipu) · Feb 2026

Z.ai's 744B open-weights MoE — within ~4 points of Opus 4.6 on SWE-bench Verified at $1/$3.20 per million tokens.

The verdict

GLM-5 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for GLM-4.6. GLM-4.6 is about 1.6x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix).

Benchmark head-to-head 01

SWE-bench Verified
68%~77.8%
GLM-4.6GLM-5

Specs & pricing

GLM-4.6GLM-5
modhub Index63.9
Input price / 1M$0.6$1
Output price / 1M$2.2$3.2
Context window200K200K
Max output128K128K
Open weightsyes (MIT)yes (MIT)
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtexttext
Knowledge cutoffJul 2025Dec 2025
ReleasedSep 2025Feb 2026
Example monthly cost*$9.30$14.80

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, GLM-4.6 or GLM-5?
GLM-5 wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for GLM-4.6. GLM-4.6 is about 1.6x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix).
Which is cheaper, GLM-4.6 or GLM-5?
GLM-4.6 costs $0.6/$2.2 per million input/output tokens, while GLM-5 costs $1/$3.2. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $9.30 versus $14.80.
Which model is better for coding, GLM-4.6 or GLM-5?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — GLM-5 scores ~77.8% versus 68% for GLM-4.6, making GLM-5 the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons