Gemini 3.5 Flash vs OpenAI o4-mini

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Google · May 2026

Google's I/O 2026 headliner: near-Pro intelligence at Flash speed, 78.8% on SWE-bench Verified with full multimodal input.

OpenAI o4-mini

OpenAI · Apr 2025

80.9

A compact reasoning model that punched far above its price on math — 92.7% on AIME 2025 at $1.10 per million input tokens.

The verdict

Gemini 3.5 Flash wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for OpenAI o4-mini. OpenAI o4-mini is about 1.8x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix). Gemini 3.5 Flash also takes 1M of context versus 200K for OpenAI o4-mini.

Benchmark head-to-head 10

SWE-bench Verified
78.8%68.1%
Gemini 3.5 FlashOpenAI o4-mini

Specs & pricing

Gemini 3.5 FlashOpenAI o4-mini
modhub Index80.9
Input price / 1M$1.5$1.1
Output price / 1M$9$4.4
Context window1M200K
Max output66K100K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, image, audio, videotext, image
Knowledge cutoffFeb 2026May 2024
ReleasedMay 2026Apr 2025
Example monthly cost*$28.50$17.60

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash or OpenAI o4-mini?
Gemini 3.5 Flash wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for OpenAI o4-mini. OpenAI o4-mini is about 1.8x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix). Gemini 3.5 Flash also takes 1M of context versus 200K for OpenAI o4-mini.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash or OpenAI o4-mini?
Gemini 3.5 Flash costs $1.5/$9 per million input/output tokens, while OpenAI o4-mini costs $1.1/$4.4. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $28.50 versus $17.60.
Which model is better for coding, Gemini 3.5 Flash or OpenAI o4-mini?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Gemini 3.5 Flash scores 78.8% versus 68.1% for OpenAI o4-mini, making Gemini 3.5 Flash the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons