Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Qwen3-Max

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Google · Mar 2026

Google's flagship with the industry's largest context window — 2M tokens — and frontier multimodal reasoning at $2/$12.

Qwen3-Max

Alibaba (Qwen) · Sep 2025

80.5

Alibaba's trillion-parameter API flagship — frontier-adjacent quality with strong agentic tool use at mid-tier prices.

The verdict

Gemini 3.1 Pro wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Qwen3-Max. Qwen3-Max is about 1.9x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix). Gemini 3.1 Pro also takes 2M of context versus 262K for Qwen3-Max.

Benchmark head-to-head 10

SWE-bench Verified
~78%69.6%
Gemini 3.1 ProQwen3-Max

Specs & pricing

Gemini 3.1 ProQwen3-Max
modhub Index80.5
Input price / 1M$2$1.2
Output price / 1M$12$6
Context window2M262K
Max output66K66K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, image, audio, videotext
Knowledge cutoffNov 2025Jun 2025
ReleasedMar 2026Sep 2025
Example monthly cost*$38.00$21.00

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Qwen3-Max?
Gemini 3.1 Pro wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Qwen3-Max. Qwen3-Max is about 1.9x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix). Gemini 3.1 Pro also takes 2M of context versus 262K for Qwen3-Max.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Qwen3-Max?
Gemini 3.1 Pro costs $2/$12 per million input/output tokens, while Qwen3-Max costs $1.2/$6. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $38.00 versus $21.00.
Which model is better for coding, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Qwen3-Max?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Gemini 3.1 Pro scores ~78% versus 69.6% for Qwen3-Max, making Gemini 3.1 Pro the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons