Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Grok Code Fast 1

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Google · Mar 2026

Google's flagship with the industry's largest context window — 2M tokens — and frontier multimodal reasoning at $2/$12.

Grok Code Fast 1

xAI · Aug 2025

A speed-first coding model built for agentic IDE loops, popular as a cheap fast tier in Cursor and similar tools.

The verdict

Gemini 3.1 Pro wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Grok Code Fast 1. On price the gap is dramatic: Grok Code Fast 1 works out roughly 8.6x cheaper per blended million tokens. Gemini 3.1 Pro also takes 2M of context versus 256K for Grok Code Fast 1.

Benchmark head-to-head 10

SWE-bench Verified
~78%70.8%
Gemini 3.1 ProGrok Code Fast 1

Specs & pricing

Gemini 3.1 ProGrok Code Fast 1
modhub Index
Input price / 1M$2$0.2
Output price / 1M$12$1.5
Context window2M256K
Max output66K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, image, audio, videotext
Knowledge cutoffNov 2025Aug 2025
ReleasedMar 2026Aug 2025
Example monthly cost*$38.00$4.25

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Grok Code Fast 1?
Gemini 3.1 Pro wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Grok Code Fast 1. On price the gap is dramatic: Grok Code Fast 1 works out roughly 8.6x cheaper per blended million tokens. Gemini 3.1 Pro also takes 2M of context versus 256K for Grok Code Fast 1.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Grok Code Fast 1?
Gemini 3.1 Pro costs $2/$12 per million input/output tokens, while Grok Code Fast 1 costs $0.2/$1.5. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $38.00 versus $4.25.
Which model is better for coding, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Grok Code Fast 1?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Gemini 3.1 Pro scores ~78% versus 70.8% for Grok Code Fast 1, making Gemini 3.1 Pro the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons