Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GLM-4.6

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Google · Mar 2026

Google's flagship with the industry's largest context window — 2M tokens — and frontier multimodal reasoning at $2/$12.

GLM-4.6

Z.ai (Zhipu) · Sep 2025

63.9

The budget coding-agent favorite of late 2025 — near-Sonnet coding utility with MIT weights and a $3/month plan.

The verdict

Gemini 3.1 Pro wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for GLM-4.6. On price the gap is dramatic: GLM-4.6 works out roughly 4.5x cheaper per blended million tokens. Gemini 3.1 Pro also takes 2M of context versus 200K for GLM-4.6. And GLM-4.6 is open-weights (MIT), so it can be self-hosted — a structural advantage if data control or vendor independence matters.

Benchmark head-to-head 10

SWE-bench Verified
~78%68%
Gemini 3.1 ProGLM-4.6

Specs & pricing

Gemini 3.1 ProGLM-4.6
modhub Index63.9
Input price / 1M$2$0.6
Output price / 1M$12$2.2
Context window2M200K
Max output66K128K
Open weightsnoyes (MIT)
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, image, audio, videotext
Knowledge cutoffNov 2025Jul 2025
ReleasedMar 2026Sep 2025
Example monthly cost*$38.00$9.30

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Gemini 3.1 Pro or GLM-4.6?
Gemini 3.1 Pro wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for GLM-4.6. On price the gap is dramatic: GLM-4.6 works out roughly 4.5x cheaper per blended million tokens. Gemini 3.1 Pro also takes 2M of context versus 200K for GLM-4.6. And GLM-4.6 is open-weights (MIT), so it can be self-hosted — a structural advantage if data control or vendor independence matters.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro or GLM-4.6?
Gemini 3.1 Pro costs $2/$12 per million input/output tokens, while GLM-4.6 costs $0.6/$2.2. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $38.00 versus $9.30.
Which model is better for coding, Gemini 3.1 Pro or GLM-4.6?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Gemini 3.1 Pro scores ~78% versus 68% for GLM-4.6, making Gemini 3.1 Pro the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons