Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.
Google · Jun 2025
The 2025 fast-tier favorite: hybrid reasoning, full multimodality and a 1M context at $0.30/$2.50.
Alibaba (Qwen) · Feb 2026
The 2026 open coding specialist: 70.6% SWE-bench Verified under Apache 2.0 from $0.11 per million input tokens.
The verdict
Qwen3-Coder-Next wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Gemini 2.5 Flash. On price the gap is dramatic: Qwen3-Coder-Next works out roughly 3.0x cheaper per blended million tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash also takes 1.0M of context versus 262K for Qwen3-Coder-Next. And Qwen3-Coder-Next is open-weights (Apache 2.0), so it can be self-hosted — a structural advantage if data control or vendor independence matters.
Benchmark head-to-head 0–1
Specs & pricing
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | Qwen3-Coder-Next | |
|---|---|---|
| modhub Index | — | — |
| Input price / 1M | $0.3 | $0.11 |
| Output price / 1M | $2.5 | $0.8 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 262K |
| Max output | 66K | 66K |
| Open weights | no | yes (Apache 2.0) |
| Reasoning model | yes | yes |
| Multimodal input | text, image, audio, video | text |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jan 2025 | Nov 2025 |
| Released | Jun 2025 | Feb 2026 |
| Example monthly cost* | $6.75 | $2.30 |
* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.
Frequently asked questions
- Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Qwen3-Coder-Next?
- Qwen3-Coder-Next wins 1 of the 1 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Gemini 2.5 Flash. On price the gap is dramatic: Qwen3-Coder-Next works out roughly 3.0x cheaper per blended million tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash also takes 1.0M of context versus 262K for Qwen3-Coder-Next. And Qwen3-Coder-Next is open-weights (Apache 2.0), so it can be self-hosted — a structural advantage if data control or vendor independence matters.
- Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Qwen3-Coder-Next?
- Gemini 2.5 Flash costs $0.3/$2.5 per million input/output tokens, while Qwen3-Coder-Next costs $0.11/$0.8. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $6.75 versus $2.30.
- Which model is better for coding, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Qwen3-Coder-Next?
- On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Qwen3-Coder-Next scores 70.6% versus ~48.9% for Gemini 2.5 Flash, making Qwen3-Coder-Next the stronger pick for coding agents.