Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Kimi K2 Thinking

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Google · Jun 2025

The 2025 fast-tier favorite: hybrid reasoning, full multimodality and a 1M context at $0.30/$2.50.

Kimi K2 Thinking

Moonshot AI · Nov 2025

67.6

A trillion-parameter open reasoning agent that can chain 200–300 tool calls — the open-weights agentic standout of late 2025.

The verdict

Kimi K2 Thinking wins 2 of the 2 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Gemini 2.5 Flash. Gemini 2.5 Flash is about 1.3x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix). Gemini 2.5 Flash also takes 1.0M of context versus 262K for Kimi K2 Thinking. And Kimi K2 Thinking is open-weights (Modified MIT), so it can be self-hosted — a structural advantage if data control or vendor independence matters.

Benchmark head-to-head 02

SWE-bench Verified
~48.9%71.3%
Gemini 2.5 FlashKimi K2 Thinking
GPQA Diamond
~78.3%84.5%
Gemini 2.5 FlashKimi K2 Thinking

Specs & pricing

Gemini 2.5 FlashKimi K2 Thinking
modhub Index67.6
Input price / 1M$0.3$0.6
Output price / 1M$2.5$2.5
Context window1.0M262K
Max output66K
Open weightsnoyes (Modified MIT)
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, image, audio, videotext
Knowledge cutoffJan 2025Apr 2025
ReleasedJun 2025Nov 2025
Example monthly cost*$6.75$9.75

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Kimi K2 Thinking?
Kimi K2 Thinking wins 2 of the 2 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Gemini 2.5 Flash. Gemini 2.5 Flash is about 1.3x cheaper per blended million tokens (3:1 input:output mix). Gemini 2.5 Flash also takes 1.0M of context versus 262K for Kimi K2 Thinking. And Kimi K2 Thinking is open-weights (Modified MIT), so it can be self-hosted — a structural advantage if data control or vendor independence matters.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Kimi K2 Thinking?
Gemini 2.5 Flash costs $0.3/$2.5 per million input/output tokens, while Kimi K2 Thinking costs $0.6/$2.5. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $6.75 versus $9.75.
Which model is better for coding, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Kimi K2 Thinking?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Kimi K2 Thinking scores 71.3% versus ~48.9% for Gemini 2.5 Flash, making Kimi K2 Thinking the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons