Gemini 2.5 Flash vs GPT-4o

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Google · Jun 2025

The 2025 fast-tier favorite: hybrid reasoning, full multimodality and a 1M context at $0.30/$2.50.

GPT-4o

OpenAI · May 2024

The 2024 omni-modal classic with native audio in and out; superseded at the frontier but still everywhere in production.

The verdict

Gemini 2.5 Flash wins 3 of the 3 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for GPT-4o. On price the gap is dramatic: Gemini 2.5 Flash works out roughly 5.1x cheaper per blended million tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash also takes 1.0M of context versus 128K for GPT-4o.

Benchmark head-to-head 30

SWE-bench Verified
~48.9%33.2%
Gemini 2.5 FlashGPT-4o
GPQA Diamond
~78.3%53.6%
Gemini 2.5 FlashGPT-4o
MMMU
~76.9%69.1%
Gemini 2.5 FlashGPT-4o

Specs & pricing

Gemini 2.5 FlashGPT-4o
modhub Index
Input price / 1M$0.3$2.5
Output price / 1M$2.5$10
Context window1.0M128K
Max output66K16K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelyesno
Multimodal inputtext, image, audio, videotext, image, audio
Knowledge cutoffJan 2025Oct 2023
ReleasedJun 2025May 2024
Example monthly cost*$6.75$40.00

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Flash or GPT-4o?
Gemini 2.5 Flash wins 3 of the 3 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for GPT-4o. On price the gap is dramatic: Gemini 2.5 Flash works out roughly 5.1x cheaper per blended million tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash also takes 1.0M of context versus 128K for GPT-4o.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash or GPT-4o?
Gemini 2.5 Flash costs $0.3/$2.5 per million input/output tokens, while GPT-4o costs $2.5/$10. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $6.75 versus $40.00.
Which model is better for coding, Gemini 2.5 Flash or GPT-4o?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Gemini 2.5 Flash scores ~48.9% versus 33.2% for GPT-4o, making Gemini 2.5 Flash the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons