Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Google · Jun 2025

The 2025 fast-tier favorite: hybrid reasoning, full multimodality and a 1M context at $0.30/$2.50.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Google · Mar 2025

70.9

Google's 2025 workhorse flagship — first mainstream thinking model with a 1M context, still widely deployed.

The verdict

Gemini 2.5 Pro wins 3 of the 3 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Gemini 2.5 Flash. On price the gap is dramatic: Gemini 2.5 Flash works out roughly 4.0x cheaper per blended million tokens.

Benchmark head-to-head 03

SWE-bench Verified
~48.9%63.8%
Gemini 2.5 FlashGemini 2.5 Pro
GPQA Diamond
~78.3%86.4%
Gemini 2.5 FlashGemini 2.5 Pro
MMMU
~76.9%~79.6%
Gemini 2.5 FlashGemini 2.5 Pro

Specs & pricing

Gemini 2.5 FlashGemini 2.5 Pro
modhub Index70.9
Input price / 1M$0.3$1.25
Output price / 1M$2.5$10
Context window1.0M1.0M
Max output66K66K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtext, image, audio, videotext, image, audio, video
Knowledge cutoffJan 2025Jan 2025
ReleasedJun 2025Mar 2025
Example monthly cost*$6.75$27.50

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Gemini 2.5 Pro wins 3 of the 3 benchmarks these models share, against 0 for Gemini 2.5 Flash. On price the gap is dramatic: Gemini 2.5 Flash works out roughly 4.0x cheaper per blended million tokens.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Gemini 2.5 Flash costs $0.3/$2.5 per million input/output tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.25/$10. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $6.75 versus $27.50.
Which model is better for coding, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Gemini 2.5 Pro?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 63.8% versus ~48.9% for Gemini 2.5 Flash, making Gemini 2.5 Pro the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons