Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Google · Jul 2025

Ten cents per million input tokens with multimodal support — the price floor of the 2025 Gemini lineup.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Google · Mar 2026

The cheapest Gemini 3 model: multimodal input and a 1M context for $0.25/$1.50 — built for massive-scale pipelines.

The verdict

These two models don't yet share verified results on the benchmarks we track, so judge them on specs, pricing and intended use. On price the gap is dramatic: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite works out roughly 3.2x cheaper per blended million tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite also takes 1.0M of context versus 1M for Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite.

Specs & pricing

Gemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
modhub Index
Input price / 1M$0.1$0.25
Output price / 1M$0.4$1.5
Context window1.0M1M
Max output66K66K
Open weightsnono
Reasoning modelnono
Multimodal inputtext, image, audio, videotext, image, audio, video
Knowledge cutoffJan 2025Nov 2025
ReleasedJul 2025Mar 2026
Example monthly cost*$1.60$4.75

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite?
These two models don't yet share verified results on the benchmarks we track, so judge them on specs, pricing and intended use. On price the gap is dramatic: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite works out roughly 3.2x cheaper per blended million tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite also takes 1.0M of context versus 1M for Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite costs $0.1/$0.4 per million input/output tokens, while Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite costs $0.25/$1.5. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $1.60 versus $4.75.
Which model is better for coding, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite?
We don't yet track SWE-bench Verified results for both models; check their individual pages for coding-related scores.

More comparisons