DeepSeek V3.2 vs GLM-4.6

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

DeepSeek V3.2

DeepSeek · Sep 2025

68.4

The sparse-attention release that halved DeepSeek's already-lowest-in-class prices while keeping GPT-class quality.

GLM-4.6

Z.ai (Zhipu) · Sep 2025

63.9

The budget coding-agent favorite of late 2025 — near-Sonnet coding utility with MIT weights and a $3/month plan.

The verdict

GLM-4.6 wins 3 of the 5 benchmarks these models share, against 2 for DeepSeek V3.2. On price the gap is dramatic: DeepSeek V3.2 works out roughly 3.2x cheaper per blended million tokens. GLM-4.6 also takes 200K of context versus 128K for DeepSeek V3.2.

Benchmark head-to-head 23

SWE-bench Verified
67.8%68%
DeepSeek V3.2GLM-4.6
GPQA Diamond
79.9%~81%
DeepSeek V3.2GLM-4.6
AIME 2025
89.3%~93.9%
DeepSeek V3.2GLM-4.6
HLE
~19.8%~17.2%
DeepSeek V3.2GLM-4.6
MMLU-Pro
85%~82.8%
DeepSeek V3.2GLM-4.6

Specs & pricing

DeepSeek V3.2GLM-4.6
modhub Index68.463.9
Input price / 1M$0.28$0.6
Output price / 1M$0.42$2.2
Context window128K200K
Max output64K128K
Open weightsyes (MIT)yes (MIT)
Reasoning modelyesyes
Multimodal inputtexttext
Knowledge cutoffJul 2025Jul 2025
ReleasedSep 2025Sep 2025
Example monthly cost*$3.43$9.30

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, DeepSeek V3.2 or GLM-4.6?
GLM-4.6 wins 3 of the 5 benchmarks these models share, against 2 for DeepSeek V3.2. On price the gap is dramatic: DeepSeek V3.2 works out roughly 3.2x cheaper per blended million tokens. GLM-4.6 also takes 200K of context versus 128K for DeepSeek V3.2.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 or GLM-4.6?
DeepSeek V3.2 costs $0.28/$0.42 per million input/output tokens, while GLM-4.6 costs $0.6/$2.2. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $3.43 versus $9.30.
Which model is better for coding, DeepSeek V3.2 or GLM-4.6?
On SWE-bench Verified — the standard agentic-coding benchmark — GLM-4.6 scores 68% versus 67.8% for DeepSeek V3.2, making GLM-4.6 the stronger pick for coding agents.

More comparisons