Command A vs Qwen3-Coder-Next

Benchmarks, API pricing and specs, head to head. Data updated 2026-06-10.

Command A

Cohere · Mar 2025

Cohere's enterprise RAG specialist — 111B dense, two-GPU deployable, with downloadable weights for private deployments.

Qwen3-Coder-Next

Alibaba (Qwen) · Feb 2026

The 2026 open coding specialist: 70.6% SWE-bench Verified under Apache 2.0 from $0.11 per million input tokens.

The verdict

These two models don't yet share verified results on the benchmarks we track, so judge them on specs, pricing and intended use. On price the gap is dramatic: Qwen3-Coder-Next works out roughly 15x cheaper per blended million tokens.

Specs & pricing

Command AQwen3-Coder-Next
modhub Index
Input price / 1M$2.5$0.11
Output price / 1M$10$0.8
Context window262K262K
Max output8K66K
Open weightsyes (CC-BY-NC 4.0)yes (Apache 2.0)
Reasoning modelnoyes
Multimodal inputtexttext
Knowledge cutoffJun 2024Nov 2025
ReleasedMar 2025Feb 2026
Example monthly cost*$40.00$2.30

* 10M input + 1.5M output tokens per month at list prices, no caching. Green = better value on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Command A or Qwen3-Coder-Next?
These two models don't yet share verified results on the benchmarks we track, so judge them on specs, pricing and intended use. On price the gap is dramatic: Qwen3-Coder-Next works out roughly 15x cheaper per blended million tokens.
Which is cheaper, Command A or Qwen3-Coder-Next?
Command A costs $2.5/$10 per million input/output tokens, while Qwen3-Coder-Next costs $0.11/$0.8. For a typical workload of 10M input and 1.5M output tokens per month, that's $40.00 versus $2.30.
Which model is better for coding, Command A or Qwen3-Coder-Next?
We don't yet track SWE-bench Verified results for both models; check their individual pages for coding-related scores.

More comparisons